employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integra LifeSciences

Engaged Employer

Be Aware - Quality Systems Engineer Integra LifeSciences Employee Review

2.0
Jan 29, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Coworkers are very nice, helpful, knowledgeable, and demonstrate teamwork daily.

Cons

The current state of QA leadership within the company raises significant concerns. Despite their role, QA leadership appears to lack a proactive approach in supporting their subordinates, often advising to escalate issues without taking tangible steps towards resolution. Additionally, there is a notable lack of familiarity with established procedures, further hindering effective leadership. One critical issue is the refusal of QA leadership to access the NC and CAPA system. Moreover, during CAPA meetings, valuable time is consistently wasted on reiterating the details of the CAPA from the beginning, diverting focus from the primary purpose of the meeting. Another troubling aspect is QA leadership’s reluctance to assume the responsibility of signing off as the site quality lead. This reluctance places unqualified and untrained individuals in the position, potentially compromising the overall quality management at the site. Addressing these issues is paramount for the smooth functioning of the quality assurance department and the company as a whole. I recommend a thorough examination of these concerns and the implementation of corrective measures to ensure effective and knowledgeable leadership within the QA team.

Explore other reviews about Integra LifeSciences

5.0
Feb 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salary and commission were great.

Cons

I have nothing negative to say

1.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

To provide a balanced perspective, one positive aspect was the company's willingness to offer flexible work arrangements.

Cons

I would encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the company culture before joining. In my experience, the work environment lacked the level of professionalism and collaborative leadership I expected. Leadership decisions at the senior level often appeared to be driven by personal viewpoints rather than objective discussion and open engagement. Employees who did not align with the preferred direction could experience resistance rather than constructive dialogue. The culture felt more aligned with a "my way or the highway" management style than a collaborative and inclusive approach. I also experienced situations where information communicated about my performance appeared inconsistent with my actual work contributions and outcomes. Rather than constructive feedback supported by objective metrics and open discussion, I felt there were instances where narratives surrounding performance were inaccurate or misrepresented. This created concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the overall feedback process. The company has also faced regulatory challenges in the past, which may be worth researching independently as part of your due diligence process. My experience ultimately did not align with my expectations for leadership, transparency, and organizational culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All