NetApp reviews

3.8

72% would recommend to a friend

(661 total reviews)
avatar

George Kurian

71% approve of CEO

62% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

661 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
2.0
May 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance. Decent pay and benefits.

Cons

Leadership is a joke. Either no real direction, or the wrong direction. It’s a “good ol boys” club, so beware. Your pay and commissions can change at any time, and there’s no real way for you to track it. You’re following the leadership of airheads who talk in circles with no real answers or guidance. As long as they make the big bucks, and have time to golf and drink, that’s all that matters. Constant changes in goals and KPIs. You make less each year at no fault of your own- just their comp plan constantly changing.

2.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Work/Life balance is team dependent. - Some teams work ~30 hours per week, some are regularly asked to work evenings and weekends uncompensated, some are asked to make several 9:00pm meetings per week. - Peer Individual contributors are generally good to work with

Cons

- You may have your role changed underneath you with no input allowed. Simply told, "Next week you will be working under X person on Y project." - Pay is middling at best - If you fail to meet 3 days/week in-office expectations they will deny raises, bonus, and equity grants - Performance reviews occur in March, comp adjustment isn't shared until May, and payments aren't made until mid-July. - I have worked here for 15 months and have yet to see a *yearly* bonus. - Leadership - "Rules for thee but not for me", a teammate had their 2 week honeymoon scheduled since the Fall questioned by new manager due to team deliverables, followed by the new manager taking 6 weeks off so far in 2026. - Communication and response times are bad to non-existent on documents. Design documents regularly go unreviewed until implementation is complete and pushing to production is gated on approved design docs. - All decisions are top-down. Even if a data backed proposal is made by an IC, it will be prioritized under an offhand request from a VP. The person who is right in a room is almost always the highest level male. - Direct quote from Director, "It is not your job to hold me accountable. Only I hold you accountable." - You are a cog. An "Engineering Resource". Nothing more. - It is more common to be referred to as engineering resources than as engineers or by name when management discusses projects between themselves. - Tribal knowledge: A lot of information about how NetApp systems operate only exists in the heads of long tenured engineers, it is rarely documented and documents are rarely kept up to date. -General lack of engineering rigour - Code reviews regularly drag on for 2 weeks - Design documents are rarely reviewed by PM/eng-leads/management - Blockers caused by someone bringing down an internal service are common. - Feature release requires 5 different types of tests, but only 1 type is run continuously after the feature is delivered, the rest sit unused as soon as code reaches production. - Syncronous global culture: Rather than communicating during each person's working hours, NetApp regularly schedules meetings for 9:00pm+ so that communication can be done face to face (doesn't generate written information that can be used later)

Viewing 1 - 3 of 661 Reviews

Glassdoor has 6,000 NetApp reviews submitted anonymously by NetApp employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if NetApp is right for you.